I Claim

Post by **Ruddertail** » Tue Dec 07, 2004 8:37 pm

I never realy thought you were serious, though I wasn't fully convinced that you wre joking either. And it's ok, just save it for the spam section next time.

Post by **Zephyrus** » Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:43 am

The Beatles wrote: Corban, if you are immature enough to make 3 multiple forum accounts, then my fingers twitch.

Julie has several tens of them. As long as one is open about it.

As for emperorship, we can't claim without at least 15 people and three non-allied groups attacking frequently.

Post by **Ruddertail** » Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:52 pm

Zephyrus wrote:
As for emperorship, we can't claim without at least 15 people and three non-allied groups attacking frequently.

Oh. Rats. Would the rest of you aggree with that statement? If three more of you do, I'll renounce my claim.

Post by **The Beatles** » Wed Dec 08, 2004 6:28 pm

Zephyrus wrote: As long as one is open about it.

Of course, given that proviso.

Ruddertail - I shouldn't worry about it, but you know, this is only a beta game with few players and we are not recruiting people. So...

Post by **Ruddertail** » Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:59 pm

Er, I have a question. Are kills/Emperorships from one site legit on another? Like, if I joined another game like this, could I claim 1 kill and 1 time emperorship, or is not allowed?

Post by **Zephyrus** » Wed Dec 08, 2004 11:59 pm

Saying emperorship on FaF is allowed, but does tend to lose rather than gain you respect. FaF was/is always controversial, and the small player base would even make it not much in the eyes of those unbiased. And, no, you shouldn't say emperorship here, because being emperor with half the game allied, mostly HPR, and only a few players to begin with isn't something people from other Promisance games tend to care about.

Post by **Ruddertail** » Thu Dec 09, 2004 12:05 am

Ok. What about kills?

Post by **Zephyrus** » Fri Dec 17, 2004 2:26 am

Ruddertail wrote: Ok. What about kills?

Must I go and bang my head against the wall?
I so very hope you're being sarcastic.

Post by **Ruddertail** » Fri Dec 17, 2004 2:33 am

I don't quite understand what your saying, but, never mind...

Topic Locked.

Post by **The Beatles** » Fri Dec 17, 2004 2:34 am

I thought I had replied to this earlier.
I think it's OK to say that you have, say, 10 kills, but then say that 2 are from that game, and 8 are from other games, to avoid confusion. So if you were posting on QMT, and you had 1 kill on QMT, you could say: 1 kill (plus 9 on other games).

Post by **The Beatles** » Fri Dec 17, 2004 2:35 am

He was saying that since he'd explained about emperorships, the same logic would apply to kills.
Now, let's not jump at each other or lock topics. We can still discuss this.

Post by **Ruddertail** » Fri Dec 17, 2004 3:03 am

I see. Ok, thanks for clearing that up. And the reason I locked the topic was that I felt that it had no further use. I had started it about emperorship on CoG. Zephyrus had said I couldn't claim it at the time. I had asked about claiming empererships from one game and Zephyrus and you explained about that. I had asked about kills, Zephyrus gave an answer implying that I should have known, so I figured there was no point keeping it open. It wasn't locked because I didn't want Zephyrus to be able to reply.

Post by **The Beatles** » Fri Dec 17, 2004 3:13 am

Ah, righto.
Well I got the impression that one usually kept topics open by default and closed them when they really wanted the discussion to end. In other words, to use sparingly (except in the Bug section). For suppose somebody could restart it. I don't really mind, though, that's just my view.

Post by **Ruddertail** » Fri Dec 17, 2004 3:17 am

Alright. I'll just close topics that need closing, (Like if it has objectionable [sp?] content) or ones about bugs that have been fixed.

Slasher · Post by **Slasher** » Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:29 pm

i was top (not necicerraly (hope i spelt that right) empror) before the last reset on CoG...

Frost And Flame Forums

I Claim

Members connected in real time