Suggestion: Expansion Spell - Eminent Domain

As bugs and suggestions are fixed/implemented/rejected, they will be moved in here.
User avatar
The Beatles
Fear me for I am root
Posts: 6285
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:12 pm

Post by The Beatles »

sh0e's idea pwns.
What if we don't shave them off but don't allow any hawks over the 175 to factor into the ratio (for defensive AND offensive missions)?

[edit]
laddiebuck1234: they can't fit them into the huts
laddiebuck1234: so they won't work
laddiebuck1234: just you know hang around the doorway
EarthGoRoundSun: *laughs*
EarthGoRoundSun: great explanation
:wq
User avatar
Zephyrus
Eternally Confused
Posts: 1250
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 8:57 pm
Location: Bleh. New York City.

Post by Zephyrus »

Yes, but that does allow for hawk massers to go and get more land and build and still have full huts. Run-on horribly, but you get the point. Shaving off? No. Too sudden. Losing land to 200 hawks/huts pretty much does it anyways, but there are ways to avoid at least some damage.
Back. I think.
Shadow
Advanced Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:15 pm

Post by Shadow »

A cap of 300 sounds good... do you need lots of leaders or net to get 300 per Scout?
User avatar
Zephyrus
Eternally Confused
Posts: 1250
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 8:57 pm
Location: Bleh. New York City.

Post by Zephyrus »

Land. Positive feedback with a limit.
Back. I think.
Post Reply
  • Members connected in real time

    🔒 Close the panel of connected members