Ifman, your editing is not appropriate either. The idea is to be as neutral as possible in a Wikipedia article.
"The truth is a trap: you can not get it without it getting you; you cannot get the truth by capturing it, only by its capturing you." - Søren Kierkegaard
"Of the derivates, there is a diverse culture within these games. Each has their own playing style, effects, and playing community." <-- I put that back in though.
hey, Beatles, I greatly respect your game, I was just making a little joke to see what you guys would say, didn't think you guys would care that much, FAF is a great game and I am enjoying it, I still like Warlords more but I know that I like Warlords more just because I am more used to it and its people. if I had never found RWL and had started with Warbands I would probably dislike RWL. its not that either game is better, in fact I think that FAF is the more complex game and is better, its just the people that turn me off.
How'd you know I'd even see the topic? But anyways, whatever anything else, our respect dropped for you because you defaced Wikipedia. You can regain it with time, I suppose. Time does stuff like that.
Uhm... much as I'd love to see that there, and much as I think the codebase deserves it (:P biased opinion detected!) it would be a vanity article... so yes, take it down. You'll have to add it to the Votes for Deletion page.
[note to self: NEVER link to Wikipedia again.....]
