Devari wrote: Bah. It WAS a hack job. My only acheivement was seamless integration of some FAF code.
I added a couple major bugs, though. Two of the RWL bugs are fixed; the city demolition bug and the bldlst/trplst/prdlst bug.
I had the original BAXX code from the first release; I'm fairly sure that many of the bugs I have no longer exist. I'd hope, for RWL's sake, that they don't.
ya last i looked he did fix some of the lst bugs
anyhow the ragnarok code really isnt that bad and as a hack job is kind of nice
although it might have made it a little easier on yourself if you modularized your addons a little more
The Beatles wrote:Hah. With emphasis. We know at least 4 from when negotiations broke down.
i guess if all else fails you could call them "retained legacy features"
Look at that, for example. It doesn't even work, since it is so full of carp. I look at this kind of stuff and think "WTF was I thinking?!".
Two major design stupidities: the way I did the two different "sides" of races and their troops, and the garrison system. One of the major bugs in Rag could have been avoided if I had used the more sensible % system instead of a treasury-style "deposit" troop thing.
I'm wondering - any major bugs in the command line implementation?
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
Why don't we simply make a topic in the Lunch about bugs in other Promisance games? Then we can be nice and tell them how to fix it, thus earning goodwill.
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
Ah, yes, but that was a community that was hostile towards you/us, at least at the time. I'm talking about other Promisance games, perhaps based of BAXX, and other codebases. RWL has a bit of a set opinion of us - we have been (and might still be) thought of as a cheap knockoff or (recently) overly complex. They have, in the past, been closed-minded at discussions on the source code topic.
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC