Reforming Playing Conditions

News and announcements will be posted here.
Post Reply
User avatar
purekilla2k
Crazy Killa Arms Dealer
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:27 pm

Post by purekilla2k »

meh the server is fine the way it is have you seen some places? you can die alot faster at some places <_< its perfect of bfr because nobody kills because they dont wanna be killed (most of the time) *glares at gondor and kraken* the bank is useless except for cash from selling marketed troops and i like Devari's ideas
(most of them)
www.exius-ent.com/forums
Gaming Elder www.mapleglobal.com
Eternal Protector Of Redwall
User avatar
Kyrodo
Rabbit
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:30 am
Contact:

Post by Kyrodo »

They're overating BFR as *restricted for blood and gore* or something, only ryndell and n00bies seem to actually complain, as I said, like some noobies server or some what... or at least create a new, easier server (if you test it out fine or whatever...)
Image
Image
User avatar
Ruddertail
Promi Diplomacy ate my homework...
Posts: 4510
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:39 pm
Location: Chances are, playing FAF.
Contact:

Post by Ruddertail »

The problem is not just killing, it's over attacking. Any server where you one person can hit another 21 + times and not even have their actions questioned is getting too vicious. If it happened once and a while, say, when some guy had 70k and most others had barly 20k, it wouldn't be a problem, but it's regular. And people just hit too hard, over retaling for the littlest things, or smashing a person for the heck of it.
Empires:
WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ?
Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
User avatar
Kyrodo
Rabbit
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:30 am
Contact:

Post by Kyrodo »

we can decrease the number of times you can be attacked at once to 10-12 or something, that would take over attacking out of the way won't it?
Image
Image
User avatar
Ruddertail
Promi Diplomacy ate my homework...
Posts: 4510
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:39 pm
Location: Chances are, playing FAF.
Contact:

Post by Ruddertail »

Well, doing that would allow people to more easilly hog land. However, only allowing, say, 12 attacks by warband A on warband B, while still allowing C to attack B 9 times ( filling up his max) would be a good thing. In addition to stopping over attacking, this would increase land distrobution, and let the weaker folks get a bigger share of of things (since some guy with a ton of troops can't hog it all). This is probably why it has already been proposed.
Empires:
WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ?
Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
User avatar
Kyrodo
Rabbit
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:30 am
Contact:

Post by Kyrodo »

k... I'm just saying we shouldn't hurt bfr to be any less competitive, some people like it the way it is, and I understand people want to make it a bit less vicious, so any suggestions we want put in shouldn't harm the competition too much... but make the game less violent, so I just wanted to get that straight (if it isn't already on your minds...) some want to make vast changes in the game, but just don't maul and ruin it to bits! (aka, don't ruin it for everyone) Good luck with your suggestions! :)
Image
Image
User avatar
Devari
Mr. -1
Posts: 3194
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:02 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Post by Devari »

Thanks for the comments, guys.

The only thing I really have time to say is: "n00bies" are the future of FAF.
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
User avatar
Nohc
Beware of Former Fangirls
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:36 pm

Post by Nohc »

The Beatles (Hungary) wrote: I wish you guys had started playing RWL Regular. You got one turn per ten minutes. And you could play well there, too.
I'm still playing Reg, actually. If there were only more people it'd be awesome. The only proms I play now are COG, BFR, and Reg.

I think I'd be fun to play 5 or so slow games with more planning and politics instead of a coulple of fast games where you attack everyone. But they're both fun in their own way.

Edit: Yes, n00bies are just as important as anyone else. The more new players we keep, the larger the player base will be. We will always have a few diehards that will keep playing no matter what, but we need to be bringing in more members than we lose.
User avatar
bjornredtail
Warbands Admin
Posts: 821
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:07 am
Contact:

Post by bjornredtail »

All I think needs to be done is to make the individual "declare war" feature much less powerful. It's effects shouldn't appily once the target has dropped into the bottom 25% (or so) of ranks or land, and I think that declare war needs a loooooong lag time (6-8 hours) before it's effects do take place (as to avoid people just delcareing war for one land grab, than switching targets).
0===)=B=j=o=r=n==R=e=d=t=a=i=l==>
Warbands Admin

"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence!"-Edsger W. Dijkstra
User avatar
The Beatles
Fear me for I am root
Posts: 6285
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:12 pm

Post by The Beatles »

I took out Declare War entirely for now. I believe the primary motivation for adding it had been "we can do it". Thus it's not entirely certain we must keep it.
:wq
User avatar
Devari
Mr. -1
Posts: 3194
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:02 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Post by Devari »

Declare War should have an on/off switch in the config file. It could be quite useful for some variants - for example, The Challenge.
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
User avatar
The Beatles
Fear me for I am root
Posts: 6285
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:12 pm

Post by The Beatles »

It already has. I had set it to zero to take it out. Thanks to Veranor for that, btw.
:wq
User avatar
Devari
Mr. -1
Posts: 3194
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:02 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Post by Devari »

Spiffy.

Maybe we need a "Cold War" server - 1 turn/10 minutes, 300 max.

And maybe scrap BFR for now.
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
User avatar
Kyrodo
Rabbit
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:30 am
Contact:

Post by Kyrodo »

me favorite server is gonna be smashed to bits, won't it :/ (either "we have no choice" or "blah blah blah" or maybe "when this set is over"...)
Image
Image
User avatar
purekilla2k
Crazy Killa Arms Dealer
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:27 pm

Post by purekilla2k »

*disappeares* only reason im here is to play bfr <_<
www.exius-ent.com/forums
Gaming Elder www.mapleglobal.com
Eternal Protector Of Redwall
Post Reply
  • Members connected in real time

    🔒 Close the panel of connected members