Political Compass

You can talk about anything here, not necessarily game-related. You may also advertise here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Devari
Mr. -1
Posts: 3194
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:02 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Post by Devari »

An interesting website I've known about for a long time is the Political Compass:
http://www.politicalcompass.org/

If you have about 5-10 minutes, it is one of the most quality and comprehensive political placement tests I've seen. I find it relatively unbiased, as well.

The analysis and explanation of the shortcomings of a tradition linear left-right political scale make for a fascinating read.

If you wish to share it, go ahead and post your scores for us all to see! I have a feeling I know the general trend in this forum, though. ;)
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
User avatar
Corban
Forum Maniac
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Kentucky

Post by Corban »

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.08

Apparently I am relatively neutral... (well at least that's what I understood...)

I am retaking it to see what I get the second time around :D .

Edit: Second Time Around:

The Political Compass

Economic Left/Right: 1.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 4.00

This time I thought about my answers much less and clicked according to instinct... I believe the first one is more accurate.\

p.s. Thanks for showing me the site Devari, I enjoyed it.
Formerly LordBrockFreak
http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/Corban/
"We're closer now than we've ever been to finishing." ~The Beatles
User avatar
Ruddertail
Promi Diplomacy ate my homework...
Posts: 4510
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:39 pm
Location: Chances are, playing FAF.
Contact:

Post by Ruddertail »

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.90

That's my score. About where I'd expect, actually. Pretty well balanced.
Empires:
WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ?
Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
User avatar
Nohc
Beware of Former Fangirls
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:36 pm

Post by Nohc »

I've taken that before... Lemme see if I can find what I got...

Yeah, I took it on RWL abut a year and a half ago. XD Here's what I got then.

Economic Left/Right: -2.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.36

I'll take it again and see how it's changed...
User avatar
Devari
Mr. -1
Posts: 3194
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:02 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Post by Devari »

Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.65

Weird, eh?
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
User avatar
Nohc
Beware of Former Fangirls
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:36 pm

Post by Nohc »

Weird to the extreme. I guess you always picked "Strongly Agree" or "Strongly Disagree" :P

I just took it again and got this:

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -5.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.56

So basically I feel stronger about my old opinions.
User avatar
The Beatles
Fear me for I am root
Posts: 6285
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:12 pm

Post by The Beatles »

Economic Left/Right: -6.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72

Side notes:
1. I marked that theaters and museums should be state supported.
2. On activities out of marriage, I marked that I don't consider it morally wrong, just really silly.
3. A lot of the "should" questions were like, yes I think it should be that way in an ideal world, but I'd eat my hat if it worked in our world.


[edit] Devari -- XD we already knew you were a commie-hippie-anarchist! :D
:wq
User avatar
Devari
Mr. -1
Posts: 3194
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:02 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Post by Devari »

I know, :P I'm doomed! Doomed, I tell you!

I have to say, you all seem to have showed up more or less as I would expect. I sort of see most of the forum-goers here as, more or less, moderate, with perhaps some small leanings to the "Right". Beatles' economic score is right where I expected, with all the Open Source stuff. ;)

Interestingly enough, I think the few people here that would score high on the authoritarian scale are mostly gone.

Corban, glad you enjoyed it.

Nohc, I've also experienced a drift to the left. The more articles and opinion pieces (representing various political views) I read, the more I tend to solidify in my whole commie-hippie-anarchist viewpoint. :P

The humerous thing about my economic score is that, despite the fact I like many of the principles of communism, I don't think it could actually work on a sufficiently large enough scale to make any sort of impact on the world. If you actually look at communist states throughout history, they tend not to remain communist very long. At the very least, not liberally communist, but more authoritarian communist. China, one of the last remaining "communist" countries, is openly moving towards free-market economics. The USSR had begun to turn its back on communism almost as soon as Lenin died and the Left Opposition was expelled and/or purged.

For reference, my scores throughout history:

March 1st, 2004:
Economic Left/Right: -6.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.64

March 29th, 2004:
Economic Left/Right: -7.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.36

May 27th, 2004:
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.08

March 4th, 2005:
Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.54

Now:
Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.65

As I said, a rather glaring leftward drift.
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
ohmyjapan16
Sir Devari's Squire
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:15 am

Post by ohmyjapan16 »

On the economic section I was 5 to the right. (dont know whether its a plus or negative) and 2 to the authoritarian side. Eh, thought I would be more to the authoritarian and more to the right for economics. Reaganomics, rather. :D
It ain't about how hard ya hit. It's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward. How much you can take and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done!
User avatar
The Beatles
Fear me for I am root
Posts: 6285
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:12 pm

Post by The Beatles »

Just retook this:

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.90

(Apparently quite close to Nelson Mandela. Omg pwned, or words to that effect.)


To elaborate more on that, I do believe in a strongly regulated market and social services. Economically and socially, I am rather a socialist.

On the second score, for the selfsame reasons that I am an economic socialist, I'm also a social authoritarian. But this is more complicated, because I also believe in personal freedom. Essentially the fine distinctions of WHERE I am an authoritarian and where a libertarian get mixed up into a big Average. The actual truth is that I am authoritarian as concerns public interaction, and libertarian as concerns private matters. So far I've always found that to be my sensible viewpoint, and I would definitely back that view up to the hilt.


By the way, here is a very convincing argument for "Man over Moment".

http://www.politicalcompass.org/extremeright

Look at the huge shift in all political parties that occurred during 1980-1990. Yep, there's one person responsible for that, Thatcher.
:wq
User avatar
Kraken
MLR
Posts: 1522
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:59 pm
Location: Tennessee USA hooah!
Contact:

Post by Kraken »

Economic Left/Right: 100% right
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 100% Libertarian

:o
all about FAVRE, come on...you know you want to click it

..."I'm sorry, but I really can't see anything redeeming in your philosophy other than that dinosaurs are cute."
~Beatles

The Kraken, which is found primarily in Scandinavian myth, was a huge sea creature. It was said to lie at the bottom of the sea for a long time and then it would rest at the surface....Like the Midgard serpent in the Norse myths, the Kraken was supposed to rise to the surface at the end of the world.
User avatar
The Beatles
Fear me for I am root
Posts: 6285
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:12 pm

Post by The Beatles »

Neo-liberal anarchist? :P
:wq
User avatar
windhound
Fish Rocketh, cows sucketh
Posts: 1030
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 4:36 pm
Location: Ze Ocean

Post by windhound »

meh. not sure if I ever took that.. went ahead.. few questions I found odd
Controlling inflation is more important than controlling unemployment.
this is pure economics
if you focus on unemployment inflation will go rampant. go to kick inflation down to a better level and unemployment spikes
focus on inflation (while keeping half an eye on unemployment) will keep prices reasonable and unemployment will hover around its 'natural' rate
The prime function of schooling should be to equip the future generation to find jobs.
er. what else should school be for? getting a base of information while in public schools, then refine in college (or get a job at mc donalds or wally world)
First-generation immigrants can never be fully integrated within their new country.
now thats just silly. my former boss at Duke was born and raised somewhere in south america, moved here as an adult, learned english, and ended up as a professor at Duke and doing research on brain proteins. seemed pretty damn integrated to me
Although the electronic age makes official surveillance easier, only wrongdoers need to be worried.
depends on if they're aiming the camera at only public places or into your house. I honestly dont have a problem with cameras in public places. I would be worried if they got more personal.
Mothers may have careers, but their first duty is to be homemakers.
heh. they're funny. really.

also, what was with the whole section about gays?

anyways, I ended two clicks from ghandi ;) (ghandi being more extreme authoritarian.. or rather, less as its neg)
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -1.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.15
Hobbs FTW!
User avatar
The Beatles
Fear me for I am root
Posts: 6285
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:12 pm

Post by The Beatles »

I agree that some questions were silly, but not exactly the same ones as you found silly. Cultural thing.

For instance, I wrote "Strongly Disagree" to the one you quote above on jobs. I also wrote "Agree" to the last one about mothers, although the view is of course too simplistic.

The ones I found ridiculous were the ones about corporations, like "What's good for the most successful corporations is always, ultimately, good for all of us." or "The only social responsibility of a company should be to deliver a profit to its shareholders."

Also this one: "No broadcasting institution, however independent its content, should receive public funding." (Strongly disagree, of course.)
:wq
User avatar
windhound
Fish Rocketh, cows sucketh
Posts: 1030
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 4:36 pm
Location: Ze Ocean

Post by windhound »

as far as the 'mother' question, I think it depends on the definition of homemaker. I'm thinking 'wash dishes, clean cloths, make food' over a career
if you agree with that then I think yer a tad narrow minded, maybe a century behind, but you're fully entitted to that
however, kids should always come before almost anything. that goes for mum and dad ;)
if you are too busy to spend time with yer son / daughter you should have thought more before creating a life thats wholely dependant on you.. just my thoughts though

and, er, if the purpose of school isnt to help people attain jobs, what is it good for?
Dicipline should be the parent's job. Socializing with peers? sure. but is that really the primary?

"What's good for the most successful corporations is always, ultimately, good for all of us."
seems silly, but then again, if a corperation is doing well they'll likely to use their extra capitol to build and hire more people, ultimatly enabling the company to make more money. *shrug*

"The only social responsibility of a company should be to deliver a profit to its shareholders."
we looked at this in econ.. in many cases this is true. should it be this way? no, I dont really think so. but is it? yeah..

my two cents
Hobbs FTW!
Post Reply
  • Members connected in real time

    🔒 Close the panel of connected members