Land Catching proposal

Post by **Gen. Volkov** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:39 pm

A good ratio, but mission success is dependant on number of leaders as well. I've had a 230 ratio but only 1 mil hawks up against a guy with a 100 ratio but 4 mil hawks and LOST when I tried to do stuff against him. And of course, when you lose hawks, you have to spend more turns to get them back plus whatever new ones you want to build, instead of just building new ones.

Post by **Devari** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:49 pm

That would be because your attack ratio is not based on your land, but the average of yours and the defender's.

Post by **Gen. Volkov** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:51 pm

Yuss, so losing leaders=bad.

Post by **The Beatles** » Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:09 pm

The defender would also in time lose leaders, don't forget.

Post by **Gen. Volkov** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 3:24 am

Meh, I was just making a point. Besides, the defender wouldn't lose leaders until he took a turn, which means your ratio sucks even more as you try to do stuff to him and his good ratio.

Post by **The Beatles** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:13 am

In other words there is no first-mover advantage. Desirable.

Post by **Gen. Volkov** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:24 am

Hmm, good point. But I still think there should be some way to prevent magers from getting hurt.

Post by **Freenhult** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:43 pm

*Cough* Bump

Yes... I do know about the bump option

Slasher · Post by **Slasher** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:17 pm

*Cough* bumpx2 above the spam

Post by **Freenhult** » Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:41 pm

I've stuck this in here, as it has passed and needs to be implemented.

Slasher · Post by **Slasher** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 3:33 pm

How dare you stick it

Post by **Freenhult** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:38 pm

*Coughcough*

Frost And Flame Forums

Land Catching proposal

Members connected in real time