That's what's scaring me. If he was scraping land and using his tax rate properly, we'd be looking at upwards of 40 bill/run on this land. I don't know if anybody, farmer or spy, is going to be looking at that kind of yields...
Empires: WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ? Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
I tried currently 50% and 50% markets, my conclusion is that 100% tents is allot more powerfull, even with the interest of the bank with it.
Now I am going to test:
50 turns on 65% tax and 5 turns on 5% tax, with 100% tents.
Hmm, I tried all the things, what you said Freehult, what nabata said, what ruddertail said. My decision is that 100% tents+highest tax is the best way to go. I did not even attack for land(only explored it) and I have allready 60 mill troops on the PM.
avatar of vengeance wrote: Hmm, I tried all the things, what you said Freehult, what nabata said, what ruddertail said. My decision is that 100% tents+highest tax is the best way to go. I did not even attack for land(only explored it) and I have allready 60 mill troops on the PM.
i think casher may have been overpowered a bit when it was boosted.
I have tested it, now I quit. I get sick of those people who don't have any hole. I can't play without holes <.<. Except for 40kterra of course, there it's fun to play without holes.
