eliminated 3% of your forces happy people here

[avatar of vengeance]

21.8 hours ago iluvashley (#2) eliminated 3% of your forces! 1 times
22.4 hours ago Quel'Thalas (#8) eliminated 3% of your forces! 1 times
23.1 hours ago Chitzkoi (#3) eliminated 3% of your forces! 10 times
1 days, 1.3 hours ago Quel'Thalas (#8) eliminated 3% of your forces! 2 times
1 days, 2.3 hours ago iluvashley (#2) eliminated 3% of your forces! 10 times
5 days, 20.2 hours ago Quel'Thalas (#8) eliminated 3% of your forces! 16 times
7 days, 16.7 hours ago Quel'Thalas (#8) eliminated 3% of your forces! 13 times

In total 53 times!

All those people are in good clans so warring isn't the best idea.

*laughs* I still have a good amount of troops

Strategy (#11)
Turns 282 (max 500)
Turns Stored 0 (max 250)
Rank #3
Slaves 1,966,505
Land Acres 10,381
Gold $166,179
Food 87,157,178
Scrolls 598,248
Networth $80,343,410
Title Leader
Era Near East
Race Etruscan
Health 100%
Tax Rate 65%
Swordsmen 14,773,659
Slingers 12,218,839
Spearmen 3,641,623
Triremes 25,340
Spies 12,408

[Ruddertail]

Meh. Don't ask me. I'd suggest you join a good clan for support, if it's a problem.

But, yeah, people do seem to be a little loose with the murders around here.

[Freenhult]

Not really. Its a tactical move for the most part, I really can't see WHY we shouldn't use it, much less sacking. Your fault for leaving oodles of money or troops unprotected.

[Ruddertail]

It's also a hostile act. Same with sacking. It's damaging. Therefore, people take exception to it. Land grabs would also be considered hostile if land flow wasn't so inevitable and land grabbing so easy.

[Shadow I]

sack I can understand, but getting murdered by a player who can break you for land instead is just plain annoying and deserves heavy retal no matter what

For example:

Date/Time Attacker Defender Outcome Times
Feb 4 '08, 23:44 Quel'Thalas (#8)
Clan: None Strategy (#11)
Clan: None Mission: Incite Desertion
Successful 21

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feb 4 '08, 23:42 Quel'Thalas (#8)
Clan: None v1 (#22)
Clan: Heavens Imperial Striking Snakes (HISS) Mission: Incite Desertion
Successful 21

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feb 4 '08, 23:41 Quel'Thalas (#8)
Clan: None Timber Rattlesnake (#5)
Clan: Heavens Imperial Striking Snakes (HISS) Mission: Incite Desertion
Shielded 21

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pointless. He probably could have used those turns to take top instead had he maxxed our smithies and used "produce troops"

[Freenhult]

There is a reason for that. And it doesn't bother me, I can just set you guys to war and get around it.

[Arthus]

Those murder happy elves are pissed that's why.

[avatar of vengeance]

Why are you pissed? I never do any hostile man, I'd rather just give those troops to you than you kill them.

[Arthus]

I murdered you just for the sake of it. My other murders had purpose.

[windhound]

murders were never intended to be used in such a casual way...
go to any other promi server (QM, Vahall, RWL, etc.) and it wont be taken kindly... unless things have changed since last I played at the first two, which is certainly possible... but I know for certain its not proper at RWL

what do you mean "Your fault for leaving oodles of money or troops unprotected." Freen?
what else is your net supposed to be made of if not troops and resources?
land? but what are you supposed to protect your land with if not troops?
or is getting first nolonger the point of the game?

is it really expected that one keep their defenses raised 24/7?

yall are crazy

[Freenhult]

murders were never intended to be used in such a casual way...
go to any other promi server (QM, Vahall, RWL, etc.) and it wont be taken kindly... unless things have changed since last I played at the first two, which is certainly possible... but I know for certain its not proper at RWL

what do you mean "Your fault for leaving oodles of money or troops unprotected." Freen?
what else is your net supposed to be made of if not troops and resources?
land? but what are you supposed to protect your land with if not troops?
or is getting first nolonger the point of the game?

is it really expected that one keep their defenses raised 24/7?

yall are crazy

Normally it isn't. But well. Theres fightin' for land and then theres not lettin' people run away with the lead. If I can't break you for land, that don't do me to much good. Might as well punish you if I can.

As for unprotected, I meant shields. This guy didn't raise his shields. Thats like... Huge losses. 1%<3%.

And yes. You better have spell shield up. Otherwise I'll run you down with murders.

[Ruddertail]

That's exactly my point, and windy's. People seem to murder based on opportunity. You leave your shields down, I'll murder you. You have a lot of troops, I'll murder you. Etc. Even when somebody has an easy hole (like myself) there always seems to be murders coming in their direction.

[Arthus]

My murders did have a purpose... Aside from those on Strategy. Which I must thank for all those failed attacks, you're raising my successful defence percentage!

[avatar of vengeance]

Haha, yeah, np.

[Arthus]

And to those that may care, I ain't backing down till he gets booted. You know who I am referring to. Murders is one thing, onlining is another. He did both.