Extract from shoutbox:
it is only allowing standard attacks to get through right now, all other no matter what fail.
Interesting... Is the guy under 500 acres? Because it could be forced standards...
slackware has 5,000 land
Possible misscode of forced standards under 500 acres, added an extra 0? Bug, or Beatles just doesn't want people taken too low...
Dev bug
-
Slasher
- The FAF Forums SMEGHEAD!!! lol
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:08 pm
- Location: http://florida4us.com/
- Contact:
Semi-related Proposal: Forced standards rule is based on total percentage of land, so that in a game with very little land, 500 is recognized as a lot and the new limit might be 100.
EDIT: I'm checking out the issue here though.
EDIT2: Forced standards alert you, they do not simply fail, and it is still at 500.
EDIT3: Well issue resolved. The user in question simply has enough towers so that they can defend against a specialized attack, however when a standard is performed the advantage in OP of all the troops outweighs the dp of the towers allowing you to win with standards. Sorry to #4: I attacked #3 once using your account in this debugging process, but seeing as this is a developmental server I hope you won't mind.
EDIT: I'm checking out the issue here though.
EDIT2: Forced standards alert you, they do not simply fail, and it is still at 500.
EDIT3: Well issue resolved. The user in question simply has enough towers so that they can defend against a specialized attack, however when a standard is performed the advantage in OP of all the troops outweighs the dp of the towers allowing you to win with standards. Sorry to #4: I attacked #3 once using your account in this debugging process, but seeing as this is a developmental server I hope you won't mind.
"The truth is a trap: you can not get it without it getting you; you cannot get the truth by capturing it, only by its capturing you." - Søren Kierkegaard
-
Members connected in real time
