Hello, all. Decided to drop in an let you know I'm still alive an well. Had my wisdom teeth out Wednesday, if anybody cares (which you probably don't.)
Anyhow, I'll probably drop in once or twice more over the coming school year. Hopefully come back for a bit over Summer Break... play a round of BFR or two (if there's more then 2 people to play against. Oh, well.)
Fare thee well, all.
-Rudder
P.S.
Found this rather interesting... Perhaps some of you might be interested...
http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airc ... enson.html
Rudder Lives!
-
Ruddertail
- Promi Diplomacy ate my homework...
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:39 pm
- Location: Chances are, playing FAF.
- Contact:
Come now, Rudder, of course we care. After all, I bugged you to pop in and post, didn't I? 
We hope you don't forget about us!
Good luck in the months ahead!
We hope you don't forget about us!
Good luck in the months ahead!
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
-
The Beatles
- Fear me for I am root
- Posts: 6285
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:12 pm
I would disagree with the article's point on how industrial warfare began. The points it names: ``standardized weaponry, professional full-time soldiers, mass production, mass destruction, and goals echoing the Darwinian industrial economic struggle: annihilation, unconditonal surrender, and subordination'' -- these were already (except for mass production of arms and the economic struggle) standard in Ancient Rome. The author needs be a bit more precise.
I find it very surprising that the author uses the term ``information warfare'' only in the restricted sense of warfare using weaponry that is networked and capable of sophisticated processing. Why not apply that term to a much more salient problem in modern wars of the XX and XXI centuries -- communication between the opposing sides and the role of perception and propaganda? I would not call what the author is talking about ``information warfare'' but rather ``information-enhanced combat'', at most.
Of course, I didn't read beyond the introduction, as the subsequent four categories expound on what was abstracted there.
Anyway, great to see you! And of course we're interested.
I find it very surprising that the author uses the term ``information warfare'' only in the restricted sense of warfare using weaponry that is networked and capable of sophisticated processing. Why not apply that term to a much more salient problem in modern wars of the XX and XXI centuries -- communication between the opposing sides and the role of perception and propaganda? I would not call what the author is talking about ``information warfare'' but rather ``information-enhanced combat'', at most.
Of course, I didn't read beyond the introduction, as the subsequent four categories expound on what was abstracted there.
Anyway, great to see you! And of course we're interested.
:wq
-
Gen. Volkov
- I'm blue, if I was green I would die.
- Posts: 2342
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:47 pm
- Location: Boringtown, Indiana
Hi Rudder, sorry I missed you. I've been busy myself. I'm still managing to drop by more often here than you are, but still have not found the time to play again.
Like Dev said, of course we care. I had my wisdom teeth our relatively recently as well.
Come back soon!
Like Dev said, of course we care. I had my wisdom teeth our relatively recently as well.
Come back soon!
It is said that when Rincewind dies, the occult ability of the human race will go UP by a fraction. -Terry Pratchett
-
Ruddertail
- Promi Diplomacy ate my homework...
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:39 pm
- Location: Chances are, playing FAF.
- Contact:
Beatles,
I think you might have missed some of it, just reading the intro paragraph. From what I say, his point was that warfare in the future would depend on information gathering and transmission - you destroy your enemies sensors and comm networks, while protecting and propagating your own - rather then simply more complex weapons. The justification for calling it "information warfare" is because of the fact that information is the central focus. You don't hit your enemy's army first, you hit his comm network first, and after that's done, picking apart his army is secondary.
I wouldn't term propaganda and the like as "information warfare", but rather "opinion warfare"*. Generally, the whole point of propaganda is to change what people think about an issue, not what they know. Any knowledge or information that's introduced is introduced for the purpose of changing opinions. The focus is not on information itself, but on what people think, or feel, etc, etc.
* I know the term "psychological warfare" is more properly used here, but in order to distinguish it from information warfare, which also involves the psyche to some extent, I chose "opinion warfare".
Anyhow, it's nice to know I'm missed. I'll probably be back this summer, sometime. When I don't have to feel guilty about the schoolwork I should be doing instead...
Btw, I assume you've heard about the Chinese having ASAT (Anti-Satellite, for those of you who don't know - this would have included me up until about 20 minutes ago) capabilities... Major development? Minor one? What can, and will, the US and other nations do to counter?
But not so much in the period between the Roman empire and the Industrial Revolution... Still, yes, it had been done before.-- these were already (except for mass production of arms and the economic struggle) standard in Ancient Rome. The author needs be a bit more precise.
I think you might have missed some of it, just reading the intro paragraph. From what I say, his point was that warfare in the future would depend on information gathering and transmission - you destroy your enemies sensors and comm networks, while protecting and propagating your own - rather then simply more complex weapons. The justification for calling it "information warfare" is because of the fact that information is the central focus. You don't hit your enemy's army first, you hit his comm network first, and after that's done, picking apart his army is secondary.
I wouldn't term propaganda and the like as "information warfare", but rather "opinion warfare"*. Generally, the whole point of propaganda is to change what people think about an issue, not what they know. Any knowledge or information that's introduced is introduced for the purpose of changing opinions. The focus is not on information itself, but on what people think, or feel, etc, etc.
* I know the term "psychological warfare" is more properly used here, but in order to distinguish it from information warfare, which also involves the psyche to some extent, I chose "opinion warfare".
Anyhow, it's nice to know I'm missed. I'll probably be back this summer, sometime. When I don't have to feel guilty about the schoolwork I should be doing instead...
Btw, I assume you've heard about the Chinese having ASAT (Anti-Satellite, for those of you who don't know - this would have included me up until about 20 minutes ago) capabilities... Major development? Minor one? What can, and will, the US and other nations do to counter?
Empires:
WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ?
Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ?
Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
-
The Beatles
- Fear me for I am root
- Posts: 6285
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:12 pm
I do seem to have missed some of the point in that case. Thanks for pointing it out.
Although "information warfare" in that sense has been know for quite some time, right? So in some ways it's not really revolutionary, just a rebranding of the old concept "cut off the head and the rest will follow", except all electronicky.
Although "information warfare" in that sense has been know for quite some time, right? So in some ways it's not really revolutionary, just a rebranding of the old concept "cut off the head and the rest will follow", except all electronicky.
:wq
-
Ruddertail
- Promi Diplomacy ate my homework...
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:39 pm
- Location: Chances are, playing FAF.
- Contact:
Hmm, yes and no. From what I understood, it's not just a case of "cut off the head". More "disable the nervous system", if you want to put it into those terms.
The focus is on controlling the information level of the battlefield - being able to move without being seen, seeing your enemy's movements. Being able to communicate and coordinate effectively, preventing your enemy from doing the same. Actually engaging enemy troops, outside of what is necessary to disable their info network, would be secondary - mopping up action, if you will. The battle would be determined on the level of networks, satellites, sensors, etc, rather then conventional forces facing conventional forces and trying to kill the enemy.
The focus is on controlling the information level of the battlefield - being able to move without being seen, seeing your enemy's movements. Being able to communicate and coordinate effectively, preventing your enemy from doing the same. Actually engaging enemy troops, outside of what is necessary to disable their info network, would be secondary - mopping up action, if you will. The battle would be determined on the level of networks, satellites, sensors, etc, rather then conventional forces facing conventional forces and trying to kill the enemy.
Empires:
WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ?
Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ?
Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
-
Slasher
- The FAF Forums SMEGHEAD!!! lol
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:08 pm
- Location: http://florida4us.com/
- Contact:
<span style='font-size:21pt;line-height:100%'>how i miss thee Boatius Buttus!!!
cometh backeth!</span>
cometh backeth!</span>
all about FAVRE, come on...you know you want to click it
The Kraken, which is found primarily in Scandinavian myth, was a huge sea creature. It was said to lie at the bottom of the sea for a long time and then it would rest at the surface....Like the Midgard serpent in the Norse myths, the Kraken was supposed to rise to the surface at the end of the world.
~Beatles..."I'm sorry, but I really can't see anything redeeming in your philosophy other than that dinosaurs are cute."
The Kraken, which is found primarily in Scandinavian myth, was a huge sea creature. It was said to lie at the bottom of the sea for a long time and then it would rest at the surface....Like the Midgard serpent in the Norse myths, the Kraken was supposed to rise to the surface at the end of the world.
-
Members connected in real time
